For Fraud Examiner / Financial Investigators ·
What you'll accomplish
Typologies and red flags are scattered across government alerts, inspector general reports and industry studies, and each one is long. Instead of rereading five PDFs to answer one question, you gather the public documents you are allowed to use into one Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM) notebook and ask questions across all of them. Every answer carries citations that point back to the source passage, so you can open the page and read what the document actually says before you rely on it.
What you'll need
Keep case files out of this notebook. The notebook is a reference library of published material. Do not add case notes, interview memos, transaction exports, referral text or anything that identifies a person or account. Even where Google says business-account uploads are not used to train models, your employer's AI policy decides what internal material may go into any outside tool, so check it before adding the unit's own procedures.
A notebook works best around one theme. Decide on it first.
What you should see: a folder with a few PDFs and a one-line theme. Troubleshooting: If a document is behind a membership login, only add it if your access terms allow you to upload it to an outside tool. When in doubt, leave it out and use the public version.
Google's page says Gemini Notebook supports source types including Google Docs, Google Slides, PDFs, text and markdown files, web URLs, copy-pasted text, public YouTube video URLs and audio files. It lists a limit of up to 500,000 words or 200 MB for each uploaded source.
What you should see: your sources listed in a panel, usually down the left side, each with a title. Troubleshooting: If a web address fails to load, save the page as a PDF and upload the PDF. If a PDF is a scanned image, text may not be readable, so look for a text version from the publisher.
Type a question into the chat box in the notebook. Start with a question the documents should answer.
Which red flags do these documents list for vendor payment fraud, and where? Give each red flag with the document name and the section or page it comes from.
What you should see: an answer organized by red flag, with small numbered citations. Clicking a citation opens or highlights the passage in the source. Troubleshooting: If the answer lists red flags with no citations, ask again: "Add a citation for each item and leave out any item you cannot cite."
This step is the one that keeps the notebook honest.
What you should see: a short list of verified points, each with a source you can name. Troubleshooting: If a citation does not support the point, discard the point. Do not fix it from memory.
What you should see: a side-by-side list of points with citations for each document. Troubleshooting: If the notebook says the sources do not address the question, accept that. It is useful information about where your library has gaps.
Google's page says Gemini Notebook does not currently keep a history of questions and responses in chat, and that you can save notes by pinning a response. Pin the answers whose citations you verified, or copy them into your own document with the source details.
What you should see: a pinned note or a document with the answer and its citations. Troubleshooting: Features move around. If you cannot find the pin option, copy the text and citations into a document yourself.
Compare two sources:
How do the first and second documents differ in the red flags they list for billing schemes? Give a citation for each side of every difference.
Terminology:
Which terms do these documents use for the same scheme? List each term with its document and section.
Training material from public sources:
Using only these documents, list five red flags that an accounts payable clerk could notice, each with its citation. Do not add anything the documents do not state.
Find the gaps:
What questions about payment fraud do these documents not answer? List them without guessing at answers.